<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hinkley Point C decision: reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newpower.info/2016/09/hinkley-point-c-decision-reactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.newpower.info/2016/09/hinkley-point-c-decision-reactions/</link>
	<description>Expert information for all those invested in the UK&#039;s energy future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bullen</title>
		<link>https://www.newpower.info/2016/09/hinkley-point-c-decision-reactions/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpower.info/?p=2224#comment-2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What utter rubbish people are saying about Hinkley Point C.  I would imagine that £18bn investment is indeed great news for the nuclear sector, unfortunately at everyone else&#039;s expense.  At £6,000 per kW it is clearly not the cheapest power.  Neither is it the cheapest way to reduce CO2 emissions.  I don&#039;t know what the government&#039;s reasons were for approving this project, but it certainly wasn&#039;t because it makes any rational commercial sense in addressing either our power needs or the desire to head towards a low CO2 economy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What utter rubbish people are saying about Hinkley Point C.  I would imagine that £18bn investment is indeed great news for the nuclear sector, unfortunately at everyone else&#8217;s expense.  At £6,000 per kW it is clearly not the cheapest power.  Neither is it the cheapest way to reduce CO2 emissions.  I don&#8217;t know what the government&#8217;s reasons were for approving this project, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t because it makes any rational commercial sense in addressing either our power needs or the desire to head towards a low CO2 economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Buckoke</title>
		<link>https://www.newpower.info/2016/09/hinkley-point-c-decision-reactions/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>John Buckoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpower.info/?p=2224#comment-2081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On balance, the #hinkleyC decision is the right decision. Whilst no-one wants Nuclear Power because there are waste challenges, if we are to de-carbonized our economy we have no choice, other than Nuclear Power. Would happily live next to a Nuclear Power Plant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On balance, the #hinkleyC decision is the right decision. Whilst no-one wants Nuclear Power because there are waste challenges, if we are to de-carbonized our economy we have no choice, other than Nuclear Power. Would happily live next to a Nuclear Power Plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
