<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Centrica to test blockchain peer-to-peer energy trading in Cornwall local market</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newpower.info/2018/04/centrica-to-test-blockchain-peer-to-peer-energy-trading-in-cornwall-local-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.newpower.info/2018/04/centrica-to-test-blockchain-peer-to-peer-energy-trading-in-cornwall-local-market/</link>
	<description>Expert information for all those invested in the UK&#039;s energy future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Roberts</title>
		<link>https://www.newpower.info/2018/04/centrica-to-test-blockchain-peer-to-peer-energy-trading-in-cornwall-local-market/#comment-27482</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 07:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpower.info/?p=4994#comment-27482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blockchain is quite possibly an energy intensive sledge hammer to crack what is a relatively simple transactional nut.  Energy transactions typically don&#039;t share the characteristics for which blockchain is most suited (see https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/375.pdf), not least because you still need a meter, verification of which sits outside the chain.  Here&#039;s hoping Centrica properly assesses energy impacts of blockchain processing of each transaction (and how that will grow) and other more straightforward options for achieving same peer-to-peer trading outcome.  And publishes findings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blockchain is quite possibly an energy intensive sledge hammer to crack what is a relatively simple transactional nut.  Energy transactions typically don&#8217;t share the characteristics for which blockchain is most suited (see <a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/375.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/375.pdf</a>), not least because you still need a meter, verification of which sits outside the chain.  Here&#8217;s hoping Centrica properly assesses energy impacts of blockchain processing of each transaction (and how that will grow) and other more straightforward options for achieving same peer-to-peer trading outcome.  And publishes findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
