<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INTERVIEW: Angela Love says it is time to think about long-term governance around smart meters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newpower.info/2023/03/interview-angela-love-says-it-is-time-to-think-about-long-term-governance-around-smart-meters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.newpower.info/2023/03/interview-angela-love-says-it-is-time-to-think-about-long-term-governance-around-smart-meters/</link>
	<description>Expert information for all those invested in the UK&#039;s energy future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wren</title>
		<link>https://www.newpower.info/2023/03/interview-angela-love-says-it-is-time-to-think-about-long-term-governance-around-smart-meters/#comment-95736</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpower.info/?p=12198#comment-95736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;smart meters giving price signals to customers,&quot;  Ah circumlocution  It&#039;s rationing by price. Surely that was something that smart meters were never going to be used for - according to all the  full page adverts .    The formal UK position (of the legislators, regulators, Agencies,  dozens of net-zero NGOs,  &amp; industry bodies ) is that there will be more than sufficient electricity for green sources after 2035. And yet... the constant underlying theme is that we will have to restrict energy energy usage.   My  dissatisfaction with this &quot;don&#039;t tell the public&quot; stealth approach  is two-fold   1)  that it leads to huge inefficiencies &amp; wasted money:  (e.g  meter rollout should have been simply mandatory at replacement time) .  And even the existence of the SEC itself as another layer of  bureaucracy that adds cost
  2) The embedded position that the people can&#039;t be trusted  with the complete  picture of what&#039;s likely to happen, and have to be led there by a gradual series of policy steps until it&#039;s a  fait accompli]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;smart meters giving price signals to customers,&#8221;  Ah circumlocution  It&#8217;s rationing by price. Surely that was something that smart meters were never going to be used for &#8211; according to all the  full page adverts .    The formal UK position (of the legislators, regulators, Agencies,  dozens of net-zero NGOs,  &amp; industry bodies ) is that there will be more than sufficient electricity for green sources after 2035. And yet&#8230; the constant underlying theme is that we will have to restrict energy energy usage.   My  dissatisfaction with this &#8220;don&#8217;t tell the public&#8221; stealth approach  is two-fold   1)  that it leads to huge inefficiencies &amp; wasted money:  (e.g  meter rollout should have been simply mandatory at replacement time) .  And even the existence of the SEC itself as another layer of  bureaucracy that adds cost<br />
  2) The embedded position that the people can&#8217;t be trusted  with the complete  picture of what&#8217;s likely to happen, and have to be led there by a gradual series of policy steps until it&#8217;s a  fait accompli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
