Author Archive for New Power


INTERVIEW: STEVE RILEY, chief executive, GDF Suez Energy, UK-Europe

“There has been an investment hiatus. I think EMR has taken longer than most people would have expected at the beginning and during that period you have seen very little progress.”  

“I think it’s possible that by shortly after 2016 the margins will be tighter than they have been, …. But that in itself I don’t think is a particular problem, because capacity margins have been so high since 2007.”

ANALYSIS:  Can the UK take a lead on CCS? Exploring the global context

REPORT:  Budget measures will hit renewables investors

REPORT: Public Accounts Committee probes infrastructure spend

“there is a failure by government to assess the impact on consumers” of total spend across energy, water, telecoms, transport and other infrastructure”

FEATURE: Are we building the right kind of flexibility into energy markets?

This and much more in this month’s New Power.

Not a subscriber? For more details:



INTERVIEW: Alan Whitehead MP

There is a “Bit of a vested interest in everyone being convinced the lights will go out tomorrow and we can only get over it by having this capacity mechanism.”

“Hinkley Point was going to come on line in 2018 and there would be one new reactor every 9 months. That was always nonsense and is clearly nonsense now”

ANALYSIS:  Janet Wood looks at the pros and cons of changes to the Carbon Price Floor

“Perhaps the biggest threat to the effectiveness of the price floor is whether investors will trust successive governments not to change the targeted carbon price trajectory.”

REPORT:  How does wind turbine performance deteriorate over time?

FEATURE: Scottish independence: examining the energy issues


This and much more in this month’s New Power.

Not a subscriber? For more details:



INTERVIEW: Professor Steve Thomas

EDF “wouldn’t be unhappy if it didn’t have to build Hinkley. Because of the debt, because of the risk, because it doesn’t like EPRs…

I can’t believe the EC will complete the review in six months because it’s such a big precedent. You have 11 other countries all saying they want the British model for their programmes, so the Commission can’t just wave it through.”

ANALYSIS:  Janet Wood looks at the prospects for new interconnectors

“Developers must balance the high reports from the Carbon Floor with regulatory risk, as the CPF could be removed for political reasons or eroded

the development of interconnector projects is being slowed by a lack of clarity regarding how these would be regulated

REPORT:  ‘Known unknowns’ hike DCC costs by 15% over three years

FEATURE: Demand  side response – what works in North America


This and much more in this month’s New Power.

Not a subscriber? For more details: